“Hello. My name is Don, and I have a logo.”
One of the common criticisms of successful artists (and
those who want to be successful artists), is the admonition that somehow, in
order to be successful in the world of business, we have to trade away our authenticity
as artists.
“Serious (artists) would never consider such branding as
anything but a sellout to their true pure artistic intentions,” said one
Serious Artist, to me, recently. This person warned against any artist allowing
himself to be made “into a brand, into a consumer product, into providing art
fodder for the consumption of the mediocre …” As if one follows the other.
Maybe it does. Maybe mediocrity is all I can hope to shoot
for in this otherwise successful art career.
But then, maybe the work I have already
completed, the work I am doing, and the work I still plan to do, disputes that
claim.
I'll acknowledge that this is a concern to many who ride the
narrow and brittle edge of some imagined requirement of authenticity in their work. But I have an answer to that
concern:
If I create it, it is authentically mine.
I am aware of any number of forces that influence my creativity:
ideas gleaned form my surroundings (conversations, walks around the
neighborhood, various reading material, etc.); from my past (experience,
education, childhood memories); suggestions from friends, family, critics and
fellow artists; requests from the market (customers, clients, market research,
seasonal trends); the results of actual, premeditated, focused research,
& cetera.
To me, all of these are legitimate sources of inspiration.
If ideas that come from any one of them (hopefully from ALL of them) lead to
another piece of artwork that I can create authentically, in my style, to my
standards, and ultimately to my liking, I see no difference in the quality of
the source or the quality of the end product. Or, frankly, where it happens to appear
in the marketplace.
Each year, in fact, I try to do at least one piece aimed
specifically for the mass market, one created for clever content (whether the
market agrees or not), and one just for me - to challenge and broaden my
intellectual, imaginative, and technical ability (again, whether the market
agrees or not).
Oddly enough, nowhere in the list do I find the approval of
my fellow artists to be a major factor in the production of consistent, quality
work.
Perhaps there are artists who find themselves being overly influenced by
one audience or another, critics or customers or even colleagues - or who
actually choose to rely on others' advice for creative direction. Aren't they free to do so?
Beyond my position as a potential consumer (or unless somebody asks), I see no reason
to offer my opinion on their product or their process.
The only one I am fit to
judge, authentically, is myself.
No comments:
Post a Comment